麻豆传媒映画

According in the Court of Appeal, sellers intending to sell a property to a potential buyer must let them know about any noisy or problematic neighbours, specifically if they know that one of the buyer鈥檚 major reasons for buying is to live somewhere peaceful and quiet.

The ruling comes after a specific case in which a woman, Mme H, had begun the process of buying an apartment, having previously been clear that one of her major priorities was to live somewhere quiet.

Upon learning that there was a court case in process over problems with the apartment鈥檚 neighbours - including allegations such as building damage and drug use - she refused to let the sale go through.

When the seller demanded the usual payment penalty over Mme H鈥檚 鈥渂reaking of the contract鈥�, Mme H refused to pay, saying that there had been a lack of information given about the neighbour situation.

This was unacceptable, Mme H said, especially as she had openly stated that one of her top criteria for buying the apartment was to seek peace and quiet, in light of abuse and violence she had suffered as a child.

The seller claimed that Mme H had been aware of the 鈥減roblematic鈥� behaviour of the neighbours because it was referred to in some meeting minutes supplied as part of the sale documents however the Court of Appeal rejected this and threw out the seller鈥檚 demand for a penalty payment.

Evidence showed that during visits to the property, the seller had in fact assured Mme H that there was no problem with the neighbours. As a result, the seller guilty of 鈥渇raudulent reticence鈥�.

The Court of Cassation, which also considered the case, agreed that Mme H鈥檚 consent to purchase the property had been flawed, because the seller had concealed the extent of the neighbours鈥� behaviour.

It the sale could be cancelled, and no payment from Mme H was due.